Category: Results

  • ๐Ÿ“Š ๐—œ๐—ง๐—ฉ ๐—›๐—ฎ๐—น๐—ณ-๐—ฌ๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐—ฟ ๐—ฃ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ณ๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—บ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฐ๐—ฒ: ๐—ฆ๐—ผ๐—น๐—ถ๐—ฑ ๐—ฏ๐˜‚๐˜ ๐—ฆ๐˜๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ด๐—ถ๐—ฐ ๐—ค๐˜‚๐—ฒ๐˜€๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป๐˜€ ๐—ฅ๐—ฒ๐—บ๐—ฎ๐—ถ๐—ป

    ๐Ÿ“Š ๐—œ๐—ง๐—ฉ ๐—›๐—ฎ๐—น๐—ณ-๐—ฌ๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐—ฟ ๐—ฃ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ณ๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—บ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฐ๐—ฒ: ๐—ฆ๐—ผ๐—น๐—ถ๐—ฑ ๐—ฏ๐˜‚๐˜ ๐—ฆ๐˜๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ด๐—ถ๐—ฐ ๐—ค๐˜‚๐—ฒ๐˜€๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป๐˜€ ๐—ฅ๐—ฒ๐—บ๐—ฎ๐—ถ๐—ป

    ITV results were announced yesterday with what I thought was a solid half-year performance. The core mission, transforming their linear business into digital, is going well and they’re well on their way to ยฃ750m digital in 2026, although growth did slow a touch in this period.

    …Non-digital advertising was even up slightly (ยฃ48m / 7.6%) in H1 24. However, with the Euros and standout hits like Mr. Bates, I’m not convinced a true like-for-like comparison would be as flattering.

    Their other goal, expanding studios, took a hit for various reasons. These issues will resolve over time, but the underlying concerning statistic for me was the percentage of revenue coming from streamers, which fell to 22% (from 29%). While internal delivery remains a significant income, if they’re not converting new streamer business, relying on other FTA broadcasters in similarly difficult markets (who are potentially less well run), will make substantial growth tricky.

    While their digital conversion is progressing well, and it’s clear the business is well-managed, it strikes me their ultimate goal doesn’t seem particularly exciting. Surely being anything other than the ‘#1 Commercial Broadcaster Video On Demand Platform’ would be a failure for the clear #1 Commercial Broadcaster. At best, replacing linear revenue with digital revenue will give or take result in a business of the same size.

    Other options?
    1. ๐— ๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐—ธ๐—ฒ๐˜ ๐—–๐—ฎ๐—ฝ ๐—ข๐—ฝ๐—ฝ๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐˜๐˜‚๐—ป๐—ถ๐˜๐˜†: ITV’s Market Cap (ยฃ3.1B) is still a bargain for a well-run broadcaster reaching 40m-45m each month and a successful digital platform with 14.6m MAUs and 1m subs. The worst move would be to rebrand it. ITV is a longstanding, loved brand in tune with it’s audience. But a significant and serious catalogue could fall in behind them to make an immediate, serious international move. Sadly, that’s not usually how these things go.
    2. ๐—”๐—ฐ๐—พ๐˜‚๐—ถ๐˜€๐—ถ๐˜๐—ถ๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ ๐—š๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐˜„๐˜๐—ต: Being in a strong financial position, not overly leveraged, they could become acquisitive themselves. Anything stateside might be challenging but there are plenty of interesting EMEA targets. Applying their demonstrably effective management approach to other media groups could yield value, particularly if combined with…
    3. ๐—”๐—ด๐—ด๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐˜€๐˜€๐—ถ๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ ๐——๐—ถ๐—ด๐—ถ๐˜๐—ฎ๐—น ๐—ฆ๐˜๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ด๐˜†: ITV emphasised the importance of their FTA digital play (vs. Subscriptions). How about stop playing nice with your peers (Freely), acquire a larger catalogue(s) and build out a major European commercial VOD platform? Their massive FTA audience could be upsold into a deeper experience and could be an opportunity if scaled across multiple substantial markets.

    All that said, kudos to ITV. These are solid results, and while I wonder if they could be more aggressive, you can’t underplay the skill with which they’ve executed their plan.ย Any one of my options would add significant distraction.

  • ITV Results Analysis, impressive growth, but is it enough?

    ITV Results Analysis, impressive growth, but is it enough?

    ITV Results came out via itโ€™s annual report last week. I always find these interesting, often more for the information that’s not included, rather than the info that is!

    Last year ITV very helpfully included data on linear advertising revenues (โ€˜Linear Remains Resilientโ€™). With declining resiliency, theyโ€™ve opted not to do that this year but we can still piece together the picture. Linear will have delivered nearly ยฃ1,363m in 2024, not far above 2020โ€™s Covid ridden performance. Q1.24 is apparently better, 3% up YoY (although 23 is a shitty baseline). We wonโ€™t see their detailed quarterly phasing for a couple of months, but if theyโ€™re hitting their projected 15% increase in digital income, this would probably still see a marginal YoY decline in linear.

    2024โ€™s green bar of โ€˜Non-digital Advertisingโ€™ may include a 0% – 5% overcount in Other advertising which was apparent when they reported both linear and digital advertising in 21 & 22.

    ITV Studios is without doubt a success story for ITV, growing substantially over recent years. They called out growth they needed with global streamers, and theyโ€™re hitting their target. They also produce a lot for their own internal channels but it was everything else they produce which I found interesting. 2023 saw a 17% decrease YoY in revenue from other (non-internal, non-streamer) broadcasters. From the chart itโ€™s not a clear trend, at best you could call it โ€˜volatileโ€™. But revenue diversity is important and it will be interesting to see how this develops.

    ITVX growth has also been impressive. Growing to 12.5m monthly active users with each user watching incrementally more! Sadly I donโ€™t have full access to BARB anymore but you can pull together a reasonable proxy for linear from publicly available data. By my reckoning, ITVโ€™s linear Monthly Active Users (or reach) in 2023 was 45m and they streamed a total of nearly 8Bn hours, or the equivalent of 14 hours per user per month. Compared against the 12.5m MAUs streaming 10 hours a month on their digital service.

    ITVX User base and consumption

    I have 2 perspectives on this..

    1. If you consider how much revenue is generated for each platform, that makes a digital hour (ยฃ0.33) nearly twice as valuable as a linear hour (ยฃ0.17). This is impressive and makes sense, with a more engaged and younger audience switching to digital first, coupled with an enhanced ad product. You would expect this differential to reduce as reach expands but I don’t think youโ€™ll lose it all! There is also a potential Newtonian impact to consider, with linear audiences devaluing as higher value (engaged / younger) audiences migrate online
    2. Secondly, ever since i can remember, ITV has been a massive and ubiquitous media presence; 45m (70%+) monthly reach . As the move to digital accelerates what will be the impact on the brand and particularly their ad business as they transition to become one of many niche (is that too harsh?) suppliers of admittedly excellent long-form content. How large can a walled garden owned platform grow on a ยฃ1.3Bn content spend?

    So what would I do?

    Honestly, i think ITV are doing a really good job but this is where i’d look to enhance their plan…

    • Iโ€™m not sure thereโ€™s anything you can do about linear, thereโ€™s only so much you can do within a market thatโ€™s turned. If they can continue to replace linear with more effective digital revenues then shareholders should be happy.
    • The growth in Studios has been really impressive, but if you dig in to an average consumers viewing day (4hrs 28 of video mins consumed daily), ITV Studios is only addressing 74% of the market (52% looking at 1634s). Video sharing platforms are becoming increasingly dominant and any major supplier of content should be figuring out how to supply content into that space too. There should be (maybe there already is tbh) a target on non-longform, potentially non-video content production. Whilst naturally easier to monetise audiences effectively on ITVX I would set targets and budgets to create bespoke scripted and non-scripted content for social platforms to learn how to deliver compelling stories in new ways, how to monetise them effectively, and also to up-skill Studios and create a calling card for more non-traditional 3rd party service work.
    • It’s great they called out the News experience on mobile, this feels like a real opportunity! Thereโ€™s some bespoke presentation on TikTok, but it leans towards to the more pop-culture end of the news. โ€˜Properโ€™ news still seems to be mostly grey suits behind a desk, clipped from the linear programme. It’s time to lean into their established quality journalism, and really play with presentation of news across new platforms to adapt it for new and younger audiences (I don’t mean just having a presenter with scruffy jeans!).
    • Content is always king, but i’m afraid an Oscars live event and Celebrity Big Brother don’t cut it as tent pole events to ‘supercharge streaming’. M&E EBITDA margins may be challenged (<10% in 2023) but they need to capitalise on the momentum they have with ITVX. Interestingly both Netflix and Amazon having been diving into sport as a important genre for streamers and it scratches an itch for many that can’t easily be replaced with other forms of content. ITV have a strong sporting heritage and I would be looking to potentially invest in this as a route to drive more viewers into ITVX.
  • TL;DR for Redditโ€™s 281 page IPO Filing

    TL;DR for Redditโ€™s 281 page IPO Filing

    Iโ€™m a Reddit, Inc. fan.ย Itโ€™s one of only two social media apps thatโ€™s earnt front page privileges on my phone – a core procrastination tool!ย Nearly 20 years old, there’s finally a Reddit IPO to review, but at 281 pages itโ€™s a hefty read so I thought Iโ€™d try to summarise.

    Views are my own and are certainly not intended as investment advice.

    – $804m revenue in 2023, up 21% YoY.
    – Still loss making $(90)m in 2023, improved from $(159)m in 2022.
    – Model still highly dependent (98%) on hashtag#advertising.
    – Unaudited accounts do show a small profit in q4.23, but this is likely due to the cyclical nature of the ad market (revenue) whereas costs (R&D, sales, marketing, overheads) are relatively flat throughout the year.
    – 73m daily users or 267m weekly.
    – Roughly half of daily users are logged in.
    – Roughly half of daily and weekly users are in the US.ย They donโ€™t disclose how many weekly users are logged in (?).
    – Users grew in q3 / q4 23, but so did โ€˜Research and Developmentโ€™ costs, by c.$80m.
    – Quarterly ARPU is currently heavily weighted toward the US ($5.51) vs Intโ€™l ($1.34).
    – Growth opportunities stated broadly as 1. Advertising, 2. Data & licensing, 3. User Economy.

    Soโ€ฆ
    – Iโ€™d be concerned that after 20 years, Iโ€™m still trying to find a way to scale the business.
    – At constant metrics, breakeven should be possible at c.100m users, but with US fairly saturated, growth will need to come from Intโ€™l with much lower ARPU and pesky things like local languages and sub-scale advertising markets.ย Growth always costs too!
    – There is an opportunity to enhance US engagement and to improve the efficacy of their ad product.
    – They have recently done a $60m (annual) deal with Google (https://lnkd.in/e_eUNVqK), allowing them to train AI models. Interesting given the wealth of detailed online discussion contained in 100k subreddits.ย Though I find it interesting for a tech company to create value by selling to a 3rd party in this way.
    – Opportunities around any User Economy are potentially interesting but aspirational rather than based on anything concrete at this stage.ย With that many users there should be some potential but how meaningful or scalable it is remains to be seen

    In summary.. I remain a Reddit fan and will continue to use it.ย Itโ€™s a great service and decent business, it can certainly be profitable. But itโ€™ll be a grind and Iโ€™m not sure I see a route to any exponential growth.ย It will be interesting to see how this is received and ultimately how itโ€™s valued by the market. ๐Ÿคž